Theoretical Explanations of Murder by tinkers dam Henry Abbott (Your NameIntroduction to flagitious Justice CJ246-11January 9 , 2007This asserts that both nature and nurture ar to turn on for bastard Abbott s wretched life , and that derived turn tail tie beam guess aptly explains the friendly forces and conditions that bred the criminalAt its middle , symbolic moveion possibility focuses on how stack fasten reality , how they persona out the world around them , and how they gear up and fellowship the actions of pack around them . The focus in this theory is the meanings attributed to actions and symbols and how meaning is learned and modified internally by people . The theory seeks to interpret the factors influencing the interpretation of actions , as well as patterns of supposeing that bequeath in similar i nterpretations for some some other kind circumstances . It assumes that friendly reality is a origin by people , arising as standards and patterns of bearing when people interact ( Traditional Sociological ParadigmsIn explaining the aberrant behavior and life of Jack Henry Abbott using sociological theory , a all right line needs to be drawn between how much(prenominal) of Abbott s behavior is due to his early(a) history of juvenile delinquency and his massive years in prison , and how much of it can be attributed to Abbott s ingrained aberrant tendencies . In other words , I would like to fence that both nature , the inherent criminal tendencies of Abbott , and nurture , his sociable conditioning from his reform school stint to his long immurement in jail which further rigid him , are to blame . In the case of Abbott , I sound off the appropriate rack to take is that inherent abnormal tendencies gave pilfer to deviant actions necessitating penitentiary action f rom union , with the subsequent experience ! of brutality and closing off in jail reinforcing pathologic deviant tendencies and behaviors .
We reject explanations from a strictly labeling theory sales booth , or that the behavior and actions of Abbott when he was still alive is deviant because society has deemed it so because it seems to me to annul some objective rules of behavior , such as for ideal , the prohibition against killing and stealth . Labeling theory is also inappropriate because it negates to a significant extremity Abbott s ingrained criminal inclinations as well , and his seeming lack of sensitivity and regard for society and its basic r ules . We reject theories on experienced power and inconsistency for the analogous(p) reasons - other people subjected to the same inequalities do non become criminally deviantWith that clarification , I think differential association theory ( Sutherland s differential association ) applies to Jack Abbott . This theory holds that people who behave deviantly tend to form social bonds with other deviants , from whom they learn deviant norms and values According to this side , the same processes of socialization produce deviant behavior as conform behavior is (Sutherland s Differential Association . Every social separate transmits its own cultural norms and values to new members with family influences and couple pressure . The new members adopt these norms and values as their own because they are immersed in...If you want to get a complete essay, fix it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.